Congress will take action against Brihaspati: After the defeat, demand was made to remove Selja, party served show cause notice

Spread the love

Congress party has issued a show cause notice to its former MLA Brihaspati Singh. Brihaspat Singh has received this notice because of his ridiculous statement. After the crushing defeat of Congress, Brihaspat Singh had given a statement and held big Congress leaders like TS Singhdev, Kumari Selja responsible for the defeat.

Congress General Secretary in-charge Malkit Singh Gaidu has issued the notice. Answer has been sought from former MLA Brihaspat. Jupiter will have to reply within 3 days. There is a lot of resentment among the big leaders of the party due to the statements of Jupiter. It is believed that the organization can take action against them. This is in the notice
In the notice sent to Brihaspat, it is written that after the election results, baseless allegations made publicly against the state in-charge and senior party leaders are going viral in newspapers and social media. We have received information that the party’s image is being tarnished due to the allegations made by you. Please send your reply in writing to the State Congress Committee within three days.

Now read what Brihaspat Singh had said
In Raipur, former MLA Brihaspat Singh even demanded Rahul Gandhi to remove Kumari Selja. He said that Selja kept promoting TS Singhdev as a hero. Selja did nothing to control the damage. He never even tried to find out what was going on. That is why Congress is in such a condition.

Here Jai Singh Aggarwal also got angry
Former minister Jaisingh Aggarwal targeted Bhupesh Baghel without taking his name. He said that the survey of performance of MLAs is conducted by the head of the government. There was never any discussion on that survey, which was a fake survey. The government could not respect the mandate received in the last elections.

During a meeting in Korba, Jaisingh said that there was no unity in the Congress in this election. This time the election was centralized. Ministers could not get power. One power remained centralized and ran the government with a few people for five years. The influence that ministers had in the district was disrupted.